+- The Spame Forum Experience (https://forums.spamerica.net)
+-- Forum: Bird-Related Discussion (https://forums.spamerica.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: No-Spin Zone (https://forums.spamerica.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Civil Conflict Thread (/showthread.php?tid=85)
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - risbolla - 04-07-2017
whyd oes americas care about sand ppl gassing each other
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - fat lesbian - 04-07-2017
lol Tyler please don't tell me u didn't know th exact same thing would happen
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 07:56 AM)risbolla Wrote: whyd oes americas care about sand ppl gassing each other
Chemical weapons were banned when the Geneva Protocol in 1925 was signed. It's classified as a "Weapon of Mass Destruction", so any use of it is against the protocol, is a justification for war if they have irrefutable proof that they're doing so. Since the United States are the world police, as well as the main suppliers for the terrorists fighting against the Syrian government, they're going to want to have control over what is happening in the war. It'll be like if Sweden started using Sarin gas against Norwegian civilians in their country. Your country would want to do something about a country gassing its people, do you think not?
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 08:35 AM)fat lesbian Wrote: lol Tyler please don't tell me u didn't know th exact same thing would happen
The terrorists are trying to broker a ceasefire again so they can resupply and regroup, they try this shit every month with something ridiculously stupid with no evidence
The terrorists saying it was chemical weapons just shows how desperate they are to gain ANY form of support in a war they're currently losing.
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/04/06/trump-syria-red-line-what-trump-has-said/100147916/
I swear to fucking god april fools day was 5 days ago
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - fat lesbian - 04-07-2017
my friend thinks it's more likely that the chemical weapons were ours than that none were used
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 11:10 AM)fat lesbian Wrote: my friend thinks it's more likely that the chemical weapons were ours than that none were used
My theory is its the gas that assad willfully gave up is the same gas that got exploded
Which means the US gave them the weapons.
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Relaps - 04-07-2017
now we gave them 60 more weapons right into an airfield
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - fat lesbian - 04-07-2017
what is uh absolutely wild to me is americans who are terrified of world war 3 right now but didn't care before
people have been dying
for years
but it only matters when people feel threatened themselves i guess
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Zomber_Jesus - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 01:26 AM)Relaps Wrote: there's no good joke with gas attack and assad because 70+ fucking people died
So what's the minimum number of people that have to die for a good joke to be possible?
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 04:18 PM)Zomber_Jesus Wrote:(04-07-2017, 01:26 AM)Relaps Wrote: there's no good joke with gas attack and assad because 70+ fucking people died
So what's the minimum number of people that have to die for a good joke to be possible?
All of them
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - risbolla - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 08:38 AM)Delirious Biznasty Wrote:(04-07-2017, 07:56 AM)risbolla Wrote: whyd oes americas care about sand ppl gassing each other
Chemical weapons were banned when the Geneva Protocol in 1925 was signed. It's classified as a "Weapon of Mass Destruction", so any use of it is against the protocol, is a justification for war if they have irrefutable proof that they're doing so. Since the United States are the world police, as well as the main suppliers for the terrorists fighting against the Syrian government, they're going to want to have control over what is happening in the war. It'll be like if Sweden started using Sarin gas against Norwegian civilians in their country. Your country would want to do something about a country gassing its people, do you think not?
if sweden starts gassing itself i will not try to stop it i will give sweden more gas
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - risbolla - 04-07-2017
it doesnt make sense for fighting wars on other side of this world to save sand ppls lives cos it will never be peace in middle east ever it wont happen its a waste of time nd mony so it must be a different reason
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Zomber_Jesus - 04-07-2017
The same thing was said about Yugoslavia and I gotta say, it turned out pretty true
RE: READ THE FIRST POST IF YOU'RE CLICKING THE THREAD (Syria Civil War) - Delirious Biznasty - 04-07-2017
(04-07-2017, 09:07 PM)risbolla Wrote: it doesnt make sense for fighting wars on other side of this world to save sand ppls lives cos it will never be peace in middle east ever it wont happen its a waste of time nd mony so it must be a different reason
"Trying to save lives" this whole war started over oil and will end over oil.
The chemical weapons attack is proper justification to enter the conflict and gain from it
Like niki said, modern day imperialism