I say yeah, I thought Wallace’s explanation of why Rachael was created gave it away
The movie’s cool but very long.
The movie’s cool but very long.
| The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$thread_modes - Line: 49 - File: showthread.php(1652) : eval()'d code PHP 8.4.23 (Linux)
|
| Poll: Is Deckard a replicant You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Yep | 1 | 25.00% | |
| Nope | 3 | 75.00% | |
| Total | 4 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Is Deckard a replicant
|
|
I say yeah, I thought Wallace’s explanation of why Rachael was created gave it away
The movie’s cool but very long.
10-10-2017, 06:49 AM
I never bought that Deckard is a replicant but K being asked if he enjoyed hunting his own kind was kind of a throwback. It would also make Deckard eating only noodles in BR an interesting detail, if replicants don't eat much else.
Anyway, I still wouldn't say Deckard is.
10-10-2017, 10:48 AM
Deckard is not a replicant, it wouldn't make any sense, Ridley Scott fucked the movie up with the billion releases of the original and adding in all kinds of bullshit. I haven't watched the new blade runner BTW so if the new one adds something in then maybe he is but it would be retarded if he was
10-13-2017, 06:22 AM
i echo was spastic just said but also, i think the film alluding to him being a replicant is fine if you take it to mean that he is very similar to a replicant which is inevitably true. that is, "replicants arent that different from a jaded cop guy" is true and the real important message which is why its dumb to think its literal. and ridley scott
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|