Posts: 2,317
Reputation:
8
About: ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
I love seeing Clintonites going apeshit saying everything that moves is racism and misogyny, because they simply have run out of arguments
I love seeing Trumpsters scrambling with excuses to hide the fact that yes Trump is, in the end, just as part of "the system" as Clinton was
oh how it all crumbles down
me and my boy Zizek will be laffing *sniffs* from the sidelines
•
Posts: 1,321
Reputation:
7
About: bones
I'm not laughing, I'm in this shit pile
(11-16-2016, 02:28 AM)shagg Wrote: are you a meme?
•
Posts: 2,317
Reputation:
8
About: ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
we're all in this shit pile
the shit pile race
•
Posts: 1,943
Reputation:
0
About: ima psycho gamer mercenary who will kill u at a drop of a hat nd hats drop ez in this fcked up world
what are u doing to fix it ? im pumping oil to get this polar caps melted asap,,,,,,im hella ready for the next flood hahahaha alot of ppl are gonna die
Posts: 2,287
Reputation:
5
About: ?
im almost sure zizek is a cia plant to confuse and delegitimize the actual left
•
Posts: 1,943
Reputation:
0
About: ima psycho gamer mercenary who will kill u at a drop of a hat nd hats drop ez in this fcked up world
yes also this trump who doesnt want to lock up hillary is probly a body double nd the real trump was killed by nwo
•
Posts: 1,943
Reputation:
0
About: ima psycho gamer mercenary who will kill u at a drop of a hat nd hats drop ez in this fcked up world
*sniffs a chemtrail off a hookers ass* fuck thats some good brainwashing !!!
Posts: 919
Reputation:
3
About: :tuodA
My uncle smoked weed with Žižek once. He's a fun guy, but better suited for cultural theory than actual political philosophy imo.
•
Posts: 1,202
Reputation:
4
About: to blow some phat clouds brah
did you ask him what the point was
The one and only king of cums.
Posts: 919
Reputation:
3
About: :tuodA
I tried to but he rubbed his nose at me and sent me flying into the wall with the force of a thousand and so ons.
For reals tho I see him as a less eye opening Derrida. his argumentation is painfully self referential and unclear. "In defence of lost causes" will break into entire paragraphs worth of digression that comment on marginal postmodern distionctions which would be fine if he ever meaningfully elaborated on them, but he doesn't. His film readings can be spot on and usefull and he gets profanity but I don't believe he's the sort of thinker who'll be remembered as significant in a couple hundred years.
•